[linux-help] Re: Red Hat 5.2 to 6.2 -

[Jesse Kaufman <glandix@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

personally, if i was trying them, i'd go for the latest stable version (of
course 7.0 was supposed to be, but you know what i mean)...  but i know
whatcha mean...  just wanted to make sure no one made a decision yay or
nay to use RH because of a faulty release (there are other reasons not
to...  : ^ )  just kidding!)

--
Jesse Kaufman                           |       WebSurf Internet Access
Administration / Web Development        |       www.websurf.net
glandix@xxxxxxxxxxx                     |       Ph: 316.945.7873
www.linuxfreak.com/~glandix             |       Fax: 316.946.9944
--

<<< Vim is a REAL man's text editor.  I don't know why anyone else would
    even bother with sissy programs like emacs, or even worse...  pico!  >>>


On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Greg House wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > > Also...why 6.2, now that 7.0 is out?
> > 
> > it's probably a very good idea to stay away from the RedHat 7.0 distro...
> > they released it w/ a cvs snapshot of gcc, and called it 2.96, which
> > 2.95.x is the latest version...  haven't heard anything but trouble
> > because of this...  
> 
> Yeah, it's got some problems, but it's also got some new stuff in it. It
> sounded like he wanted something to mess around with, to test things, and to 
> me
> a bleeding edge version would be as good or better for that. I don't think I'd
> recommend it for someone setting up a production server, but for someone
> playing the distro wars, why not?
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> 
> -- This is the linux-help@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> 


-- This is the linux-help@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi