[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=10091 >
> [per - Mon Sep 13 22:28:51 2004]:
> > These should be accompanied by higher upkeeps, which will be less
> > supportable by small cities.
>
> Good point. But then I also think Bank and Stock Exchange should have
> increased effect. Perhaps at 75% and 100%, respectively.
>
> - Per
>
That would change the A Smith's behaviour. I can't decide whether is it
good or not.
--
mateusz
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Jason Short, 2004/09/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/09/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Mateusz Stefek, 2004/09/14
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment,
Mateusz Stefek <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/09/14
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/09/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Mateusz Stefek, 2004/09/26
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/09/27
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/09/27
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Jason Short, 2004/09/27
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#10091) Game balance adjustment, Per I. Mathisen, 2004/09/28
|
|