[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8811 >
> [kauf - Sun May 23 15:06:31 2004]:
>
> I'm a little confused about this patch. IR_WORLD != EFT_WORLD and equiv
> range is not effect range. This patch _seems_ to equate the two. Please
> explain.
But can this possibly be worse than the current behavior of hard-coding
the list? A least now the information comes from _somewhere_ in the
ruleset. I believe this patch is an improvement but not a final state.
However in Vasco's patch it seems like he uses this as the final state.
This needs explanation.
As a side note, the explanation of equiv_range in the ruleset makes it
sound exactly like EFT_WORLD. What is the difference?
jason
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Mike Kaufman, 2004/05/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range,
Jason Short <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Mike Kaufman, 2004/05/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/05/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Jason Short, 2004/05/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Jason Short, 2004/05/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Mike Kaufman, 2004/05/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Per Inge Mathisen, 2004/05/23
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/05/24
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Jason Short, 2004/05/24
- [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa, 2004/05/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8811) use equiv_range for wonder range, Marko Lindqvist, 2004/05/30
|
|