[Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:25:24PM +0000, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> As I said earlier, generalizing library effects for the AI is a piece of
> cake. Provided the library only increases research by N%, and not, say,
> increases birth rate in the city (oh, the dim lights of the libraries) or
> such.
Ah, well there's the problem. I don't think it'd be enormously
difficult to code, but the whole point of having general rulesets is that
it's entirely possible to have a library which has multiple effects.
> Maybe, after I teach AI to fly well, we can have a look at AI and
> impr-gen.
Well, I intend to take a look at the code over the weekend, so
I'll get back to you then. ;)
Ben
--
ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://bellatrix.pcl.ox.ac.uk/~ben/
"I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and
democracy - but that could change."
- Vice President Dan Quayle, 5/22/89
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/03/18
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Per I. Mathisen, 2002/03/18
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Greg Wooledge, 2002/03/18
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Reinier Post, 2002/03/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/03/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Ben Webb, 2002/03/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/03/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited,
Ben Webb <=
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited, Ross W. Wetmore, 2002/03/22
|
|