Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Per I. Mathisen" <Per.Inge.Mathisen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: for discussion: ics revisited
From: Ben Webb <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:49:35 +0000

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 03:35:22PM +0100, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> This patch limits the usefulness of _only_ playing with inifite city
> sprawl (ics) as a player strategy, without imposing artificial limitations
> like notradesize, citymindist and family.
> It doubles research cost, and doubles the effect of all science
> improvements.

        Looks like a good plan. However, the changes to buildings.ruleset
won't actually have any effect unless you've applied my impr-gen patch
first, of course, as the existing code just ignores whatever you put
in for the effects of improvements...

"I only just turned around for a poodle and a corvette"

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]