Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: civserver segfault with new research system (PR#1221)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: civserver segfault with new research system (PR#1221)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Freeciv Developers <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: civserver segfault with new research system (PR#1221)
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:54:39 +0100
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:08:45PM -0500, Ross W. Wetmore wrote:
> At 12:17 PM 02/01/17 +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:36:38AM +0100, Reinier Post wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:21:17AM +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
> >> 
> >> > The solution I have in mind is to just remove the assert in
> >> > set_invention and to remodel the loop in the leakage 1 case. So it is
> >> > not about preventing barbarians from researching but to prevent
> >> > barbarian from the leakage calculation (because we all agree that
> >> > barbarians have no normal research).
> >> 
> >> How do barbarians without normal research differ from any other player
> >> with research level set to 0?
> >
> >No sane player would do so.
> 
> I beg to differ. There are lots of times I kill any of these values to
> get maximum boost on something else for a turn or so.

You said it: "for a turn or so". Barbarian do this every turn.

> You need to stop being so "assertive" :-).

At least we catch the mistakes/thingos.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "It is not yet possible to change operating system by writing
  to /proc/sys/kernel/ostype."              sysctl(2) man page


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]