Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: civserver segfault with new research system (PR#1221)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: civserver segfault with new research system (PR#1221)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Freeciv Developers <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: civserver segfault with new research system (PR#1221)
From: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 22:08:45 -0500

At 12:17 PM 02/01/17 +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:36:38AM +0100, Reinier Post wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:21:17AM +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
>> 
>> > The solution I have in mind is to just remove the assert in
>> > set_invention and to remodel the loop in the leakage 1 case. So it is
>> > not about preventing barbarians from researching but to prevent
>> > barbarian from the leakage calculation (because we all agree that
>> > barbarians have no normal research).
>> 
>> How do barbarians without normal research differ from any other player
>> with research level set to 0?
>
>No sane player would do so.

I beg to differ. There are lots of times I kill any of these values to
get maximum boost on something else for a turn or so.

You need to stop being so "assertive" :-).

>       Raimar
>-- 
> email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "> WHY?! Isn't it better to put $(shell cat cscope.files) on the list of
>  I only have a yellow belt in makefile kungfu.  These fancy gnu make things
>  are relatively new to some of us..."
>    -- Mark Frazer to Vassilii Khachaturov in linux-kernel

Cheers,
RossW
=====




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]