[Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 09:16:18PM -0800, Stan Shebs wrote:
> XML for Xconq was discussed recently, although the conclusion was
> that it was more complex than GDL and didn't have any clear advantage,
> except perhaps for greater familiarity (let us not say "buzzword
> compliance" :-) ).
If XML is adopted, in my opinion it the reason should be the
introduction of a proper parser. Another possible reason would be
different use of the same files, eg. for parsing by utilities written
in a different language. There are already a few Perl programs out
there which parse Freeciv rulesets or savefiles.
> Stan
--
Reinier
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Erik Sigra, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Raimar Falke, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Erik Sigra, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Raimar Falke, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Erik Sigra, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Raimar Falke, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Erik Sigra, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Reinier Post, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Stan Shebs, 2001/02/25
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch,
Reinier Post <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Raimar Falke, 2001/02/26
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: cityname patch, Erik Sigra, 2001/02/26
|
|