| [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Header Etiquette (was: MP3 Patent Issues)[Top] [All Lists][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
 --On Sunday, 2 July 2000 6:54 PM -0400 Daniel Burrows 
<Daniel_Burrows@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
[copying ML responses to senders]
 
There are essentially two schools of thought here (somewhat exaggerated
for comic effect, of course ;-) ):
School A: "Redundancy Is Evil.  Any attempt to send me two copies of a
           message costs me X amount of download time (and money), is
           simply annoying and ill-considerate, and should be a crime
           punishable by death, or at least public humiliation."
School B: "I am subscribed to a hundred mailing lists and get 1,000
 
messages a
            day.  Messages which are sent To: these lists are filtered 
 
into
 I got two copies of this message, and both of them landed in my 
freeciv-lists folder.  A correctly phrased rule will do this.  Finding the 
correct phrasing is trivial and left as an exercise to the reader. (-:
           separate folders.  I DEMAND that you send me a private copy of
             all email traffic, or I will shun you and never speak to you
             again (primarily because I can't find your messages under all my
             other email)"
 
 
  I'm firmly in School B -- I only subscribe to a dozen or so lists, and
  many of those are pretty quiet, but it's still very nice to have
replies to messages I wrote drop into my personal mailbox (which is the
first thing I read, and gets the most attention)
 
RIght now I'd rather that all mailing-list traffic stay in its designated 
folder.  Maybe when I'm subscribed to more mailing lists I'll feel 
differently. Well, _my_ mail client (-: (Mulberry v2.0.0) gives a dialog box before 
composing the message where I can choose, for each possible recipient, 
whether to send them a To:, CC:, BCC;, or nothing at all; there are a 
couple of relatively non-broken defaults that can be chosen.
  I also get really annoyed with lists that set Reply-To, although mutt
  does make it possible (thank God!) to override that to send the author
a private reply.  Group-reply still breaks horribly, though.. :(
 
Of course, I'd expect any halfway-decent mail client will let you juggle 
the addresses once you've started composing. 
--Jed; or you could compose all the relevant headers manually in an editor 
and feed the raw message to an MTA {-: 
 
 
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: MP3 Patent Issues, Daniel Burrows, 2000/07/02[Freeciv-Dev] Re: MP3 Patent Issues, (continued)
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: MP3 Patent Issues, Jules Bean, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: MP3 Patent Issues, Sam BC, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Reply-to-header [was: MP3 Patent Issues], Mathias Hasselmann, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reply-to-header [was: MP3 Patent Issues], Jules Bean, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reply-to-header [was: MP3 Patent Issues], Greg Wooledge, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reply-to-header [was: MP3 Patent Issues], Mathias Hasselmann, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Reply-to-header [was: MP3 Patent Issues], Tony Stuckey, 2000/07/03
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Header Etiquette (was: MP3 Patent Issues), Jed Davis, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Header Etiquette (was: MP3 Patent Issues), Sam BC, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Header Etiquette (was: MP3 Patent Issues), Daniel Burrows, 2000/07/02
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Header Etiquette (was: MP3 Patent Issues),
Jed Davis <=
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Header Etiquette (was: MP3 Patent Issues), Steve Hodge, 2000/07/04
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Header Etiquette (was: MP3 Patent Issues), Daniel Burrows, 2000/07/04
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: MP3 Patent Issues, Steve Hodge, 2000/07/04
 
 |  |