[Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 02:32:29AM +0100, Tomasz Wegrzanowski was heard to say:
> This discusion was not about realism but about consistency,
> which is good thing for every game.
What inconsistency? All I saw was complaints that several nations include
the same city, and that civilizations from different time periods are thrown
together. This is only a problem if you're concerned with recreating actual
historical civilizations -- ie, realism -- which Freeciv is not (although as
someone correctly noted, it isn't totally separated from reality, only mostly)
New Amsterdam and New York can exist side by side without problems..
Daniel
--
He was the kind of man who can use the word "personnel" and mean it.
-- Terry Pratchett, _The Light Fantastic_
- [Freeciv-Dev] It's a game already!, Daniel Burrows, 2000/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, paulz, 2000/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, Tomasz Wegrzanowski, 2000/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, Dan Ward, 2000/02/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, Reinier Post, 2000/02/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, Stephen Hodge, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] city names (was: It's a game already!), Reinier Post, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Jules Bean, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Tobias Brox, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Reinier Post, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Robert Brady, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Jules Bean, 2000/02/17
|
|