[Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> There's a misconception (at least, I think it's a misconception, someone
> correct me if I'm wrong) that I've seen cropping up from time to time on this
> list; in the last week or so it's gotten totally out of hand. This is the
> idea
> that Freeciv is in some significant way a model of reality or of historical
> developments of civilizations; that it has any more to do with national
> politics
> than chess has to do with battlefield tactics. Not only is this idea false
> and
> generative of a huge amount of needless discussion, but it's actually
> dangerous
> in the long run to the *GAME* of Freeciv.
This discusion was not about realism but about consistency,
which is good thing for every game.
- [Freeciv-Dev] It's a game already!, Daniel Burrows, 2000/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, paulz, 2000/02/15
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!,
Tomasz Wegrzanowski <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, Dan Ward, 2000/02/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, Reinier Post, 2000/02/16
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: It's a game already!, Stephen Hodge, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] city names (was: It's a game already!), Reinier Post, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Jules Bean, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Tobias Brox, 2000/02/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: city names (was: It's a game already!), Reinier Post, 2000/02/17
|
|