Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: suggestion/idea
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: suggestion/idea

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Thue Janus Kristensen <thue105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: suggestion/idea
From: Daniel Sjolie <deepone@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:23:31 +0100

On 2000-02-04 14:11:49, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2000, Steven Burnap wrote:
> > Sean Connor wrote:
> > > If anybody cares, I'd rather that there be two separate units -- one for 
> > > founding
> > > cities, and one for building tile improvements.
> > > 
> > 
> > "Alpha Centauri" does exactly this, and it works well, but it does force 
> > you to
> > plan more.  I have a tendency to overbuild settlers on the theory that if I 
> > end up
> > with too many, I can just go build a city.  With both types, you have to 
> > plan more.  
> > It also kills my other favorite tactic, which is to have a settler improve 
> > a square
> > or two before setting up shop.  Despite those complaints, I think I prefer 
> > the separate units as in "Alpha Centauri".
> 
> I also liked seperate settlers/improvers in alpha centauri

Duh!
I posted a patch like that for freeciv a while ago...
I wouldn't want it to be the default but...
Maybe I'll give it another try... :)

/Daniel

-- 
Now take a deep breath, smile and don't take life so seriously... :)

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]