Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-data: January 2001:
[freeciv-data] Re: freedata

[freeciv-data] Re: freedata

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-data] Re: freedata
From: Niels Weber <nath@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 22:24:44 +0100
Reply-to: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx

Reinier Post wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:44:05PM +0100, Niels Weber wrote:
>> Gerhard Killesreiter wrote:
>>> If, however, somebody plays as Bismarck, it would not make sense to
>>> exclude Königsberg or Straßburg, but to include Wolfsburg.
>> Therefore I propose that we have two rulesets: one modern, one historic.
> That is a good idea, but I think it's nice that the default ruleset is a mix
> of all kinds of nations.

I didn't mean to have two nations.ruleset files but just a 
german-historic.ruleset and a german-modern.ruleset (for every nation 
where this is needed).
At the startup, when you select the nations, you could perhaps have some 
tabs to sort the nations (modern, historic, fantasy) but it should be 
possible to play with nations from different tabs.
Maybe there could also be a flag in each ruleset that shows with which 
other rulesets it shares some cities. Those could be set to exclude each 
other. (So you don't have german-historic and german-modern in one game.)


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]