[aclug-L] Re: Why Linux will win and Micro$oft will lose

[Ironrose <amccadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I found the web site where the article can be found that I had heard
limited info on.  The SSSCA suggests that Linux be banned?  Read the
article and see what conclusions and opinions other ACLUG members
formulate.  ttyl ~Ironrose

http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200111/200111.htm


Ironrose wrote:
> 
> Very good responses Jon.  It is VERY easy to support M$, but it isn't
> easy to support Linux.  I feel like I am sinking and way over my head
> with some of the people who I have been in contact with.  I don't know
> how to setup a network or all internet services.  I had help with my
> setup, sometimes from James and mostly from Jeff.  I like linux a lot
> and use it a lot, but I don't know enough to support it.
> 
> If some of you really knew the questions asked and problems presented by
> NEWBIE customers/consumers, you would realize that the general public
> ISN'T ready for linux to be on every desktop.  In my humble opinion,
> linux offers good security for servers and business desktops. M$ has it
> failings, and it isn't my favorite OS, but its easy for a beginner to
> use.  It looks like XP might become the best product that M$ has
> created.  It installs and has drivers for ALMOST all hardware.  Several
> people have been very happy with it and I am happy for them.  I just
> don't want to use it on my computers, I can't afford it.  Others who
> install with older hardware and older programs, have been through their
> worst nightmare.  No OS is or will be the be-all that ends-all for
> everyone.  We all have opinions and most of us use them very freely.  I
> don't want anyone to force me into using a certain product and I am glad
> that for now we have that freedom.  James G. told me that there is a law
> being proposed that for computer security, that its proposed plans are
> to outlaw linux.  I will check to find out more details.  James said
> that he found this on one of the linux news sites about a week ago.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this?  ttyl ~Ironrose
> 
> Jonathan Hall wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:21:27PM -0600, jeffrey l koehn wrote:
> > >
> > > Linux will win and Micro$oft will lose. So
> > > sit back and watch it happen.
> > >
> > > That's right, Linux will be on every desktop
> >
> > I hope not.  Linux on every desktop would be a HUGE consumer headache.
> >
> > > and server and you can damn me all to hell
> > > for saying so, but that is how it will be.
> > > The all American Dollar rules. What becomes
> > > a standard is determined by economics
> > > ( the cost of the product).
> > > There was a time when you could get Windows 3.1,
> > > for $30.00 and that is when Micro$oft
> > > became a standard, it was'nt because of
> > > superior technology.
> >
> > Actually, Microsoft became the standard about 10 years earlier with the
> > release of MS-DOS.  It was the success of the IBM PC that made Microsoft the
> > standard, not the release of Windows 3.1.
> >
> > > The genie (GPL, Linux, Open-Souce) was let out
> > > of the bottle long time ago and as time passes
> > > it will consume everything. If you ask me, it
> > > reached critical mass in 1998. The genie can not
> > > be put back into the bottle. And so the
> > > next business/technology model has
> > > already been determined.
> > >
> > > Why?
> > > Because:
> > > 1)Lower Cost ( The Linux Kernel doesn't cost anything)
> >
> > It doesn't cost anything to obtaion.  To MANTAIN it can still be VERY
> > expensive.  That's why it's used mostly by "geeks"--b/c they don't have to
> > hire anyone to MANTAIN it for them.
> >
> > > 2)Open-source Kernel
> > > 3)The "GPL, Linux, Open-Source Kernel"
> > > is the perfect technology foundation
> > > for Manufacturing and the masses
> > > because people, businesses, universities,
> > > governments contribute to it.
> > > 4) Linux can scale up or down
> >
> > Most people don't need an OS to scale.  They need an OS to run on their
> > consumer-grade PC.  The ability of Linux to run on embeded microcontrollers
> > is irrelevant to them.  Likewise, the ability of Linux to run on multiple
> > parallel high-end servers with SCSI RAID arrays is also irrelevant to them.
> >
> > > 5) Linux is hardware agnostic
> > > 6) "Linux, Open-Source" can and
> > >      will morph into future tecnologies
> > >      that will benefit all.
> > >
> > > If your not using Linux and your
> > > still using MS windows, you better
> > > wake up and smell the coffee
> > > because the world has changed.
> >
> > I think most of us on this list are already using (or trying to use) Linux.
> >
> > And Linux is great.... but it's not the end-all be-all of computer operating
> > systems or anything.
> >
> > --
> > --
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >   Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
> >  Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (620) 367-2487
> >          http://www.futureks.net/  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
> >                   -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> > visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi