Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: webdev: March 2002:
[webdev] Re: evolution
Home

[webdev] Re: evolution

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <webdev@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [webdev] Re: evolution
From: "Dale W Hodge" <dwh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:58:14 -0600
Reply-to: webdev@xxxxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: webdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:webdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
> Of John Alexander
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 2:20 PM
> To: webdev@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [webdev] Re: evolution
>
>
> Generating the key, certificate, and signing the certificate amount to one
> command line entry and answering a bunch of question from the script. It's
> perfectly acceptable to sign your own certificates, and yes, that's wat
> companies like Thawte and Verisign charge at least $149 to do for
> you. They
> don't even sell you a key, you typically have to provide that
> yourself, they
> just sign the key, and then send you the certificate file.
>
> I agree with your assertion that maybe the mod-aolserver would be
> the way to
> go, as apache gets installed on ANY RedHat scripted installation.
> Don't know
> about Devian.
        ^^^^^^
Just what are you trying to say here? :-) On Debian, apache is the default
web server if you choose to have a webserver installed.

As to whether to go to aolserver or mod-aolserver on apache, I wouldn't be
against trying out aolserver, though my first read-through of the
instructions left me with more questions than I had the first time with
apache.  I haven't figured out how to do virtual hosting on aolserver, which
probably isn't a problem for Aclug, but would be for me to consider it for
my uses.  Mod-aolserver incurs a performance hit, the question is how big is
it, and would we notice it for our uses?

--dwh

---
Dale W Hodge - dwh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Vice Chairman & Secretary - info@xxxxxxxxx
Air Capital Linux User's Group  (ACLUG)
---




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]