[Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:05:46AM -0500, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:14:17AM +0000, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> >
>
> A counting of civ population might be a better indicator. Something like
> MAX(population during game) - pop at end of game. lower is better.
It doesn't matter what we count to get the winner of the game. People
will look to be #1 in that stat to win.
> Above all, with endyear a problem, ranking should definitely be changed
> so that a score cannot be easily [arbitrarily] raised in a single turn.
Games should be ended another way in close situations.
People should then say who is the winner (vote or something)
Thomas
--
Thomas Strub *** eMail ue80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
jb: people are stupid, they don't want to learn.
- [Freeciv] new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Jason Short, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Jason Short, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
|
|