[Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Hi Paulz!
Problem is we cannot avoid mixing because of alliances in ffa games.
When people start to form alliances we HAVE TO find a way to measure
this. They won't stop forming them because it's hard to describe that
mathematically :)
So different rankings might be a good idea (too) but it doesn't change
the fact we have to find a way to describe mixed games.
bye, hirisov
> Well, not to get too far out there, but does it have to be mixed?
>
> I don't have a problem if players have more than one score. (Battle.net
> does this for different type games, FFA, team, 1v1).
>
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, (continued)
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Jason Short, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Jason Short, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation,
Horn Gábor <=
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
|
|