[Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:47:59PM +0200, Horn G=E1bor wrote:
> Hi Paulz!
>=20
> Problem is we cannot avoid mixing because of alliances in ffa games.
> When people start to form alliances we HAVE TO find a way to measure
> this. They won't stop forming them because it's hard to describe that
> mathematically :)=20
> So different rankings might be a good idea (too) but it doesn't change
> the fact we have to find a way to describe mixed games.
If they form an alliance, doesn't that make it no longer FFA? Isn't
that determination up to us?
>=20
> > Well, not to get too far out there, but does it have to be mixed?
> >=20
> > I don't have a problem if players have more than one score. (Battle.=
net
> > does this for different type games, FFA, team, 1v1).
> >=20
>=20
--=20
Paul Zastoupil
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, (continued)
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Jason Short, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation,
Paul Zastoupil <=
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Horn Gábor, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/10/09
- [Freeciv] Re: new ranking calculation, Paul Zastoupil, 2003/10/09
|
|