Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12873) OR Requirements for Buildings
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12873) OR Requirements for Buildings

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12873) OR Requirements for Buildings
From: "Brian Dunstan" <bdunstan149@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 11:50:49 -0700
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12873 >


--- Jason Short <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> <URL:
> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12873
> >
> 
> OK now what I actually think: "or" requirements for
> buildings are not
> necessary.
> 
> 1.  This is only used for hydro plant in the main
> rulesets.  This is
> because civ2 did it that way.  I think this is not a
> crucial piece of
> civ2 compatibility.
> 
> 2.  It is not crucial for modpacks.  The same
> results can be simulated
> simply by using multiple buildings.
> 
> 3.  Complex logic makes things exponentially more
> complicated
> (complexity is 2^n instead of n).  The main places
> this is a problem are
> the helptext (we'd need long strings explaining the
> requirements, and
> the users would get confused) and the AI (the AI
> would never be able to
> deal with complex expressions).
> 
> -jason

What should prerequisites for hydro plant be?
(mountains && river  is too strict)



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 





[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]