Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: July 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8754) effects patch
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8754) effects patch

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#8754) effects patch
From: "Jason Dorje Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:07:44 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8754 >

Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa wrote:
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=8754 >
> 
>>[jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxx - Wed Jul 14 04:51:32 2004]:
>>
>>What's the difference between building_replaced and 
>>improvement_redundant?  Why are some functions called "building" when 
>>all the original functions (and the file name) call it an "improvement"? 
> 
> You are the one who told me you prefered building over improvement. :-)

I do.  But unforunately "improvement" is we firmly entrenched standard. 
  And it's more important that we have a single standard than that the 
name be good.  No patch should introduce a new naming convention without 
doing so globally.

jason




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]