Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Extended connect dialog (PR#977)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Extended connect dialog (PR#977)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: dspeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Extended connect dialog (PR#977)
From: "Raimar Falke" <i-freeciv-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:01:36 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=977 >

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:28:33AM -0800, imbaczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=977 >
> 
> On 04-01-19 you wrote:
> 
> >> - Why do the packets you introduce require explicit (non-delta)
> >> handling?  Raimar?
> 
> > Technically there is no need to non-delta on any packet. It was added
> > for the first packets (connect req and the reply) to allow interaction
> > with old system. This is now obsolete since we renumbered the packets
> > anyway.
> 
> > So there is now a reason why the non-delta should stay in place (to
> > allow interaction with other delta systems) there is no need to add
> > more non-delta packets.
> 
> One good reason is traffic shaping,

Please explain in more detail. What code shapes what traffic at what
level?

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "I heard if you play the NT-4.0-CD backwards, you get a satanic message."
 "That's nothing, if you play it forward, it installs NT-4.0"




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]