Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset
From: "ChrisK@xxxxxxxx" <ChrisK@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:25:55 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:56:23AM -0800, andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Ragnar Ouchterlony wrote:
> > > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I've updated viking.ruleset with natural city names, and added some
> > > > cities and leaders.
> > > > Any comments?
> > >
> > > I must say that this doesn't look like a Viking nation, but rather like a
> > > Norwegian nation.
> > >
> > > If it really is the historical Vikings that should be in this nation, then
> > > modern Norwegian prime ministers such as Jens Stoltenberg and Bondevik
> > > shouldn't be there at all. Also, there should be Viking cities and rulers
> > > from the Vikings that went to the east (into Russia and Constantinople and
> > > even farther east) and not only from the Norwegian parts of Scandinavia.
> >
> > Yeah, I wouldn't mind seeing Rurik and maybe even Oleg and Igor among the
> > Viking rules.
> >
> > G.
> 
> The current ruleset has two Norwegian rulers from the 20th century
> (Gro and Haakon), but I agree that using viking era rulers only makes
> more sense.

So, make a norwegian ruleset while you're on it.

Christian

-- 
Christian Knoke     * * *      http://www.enter.de/~c.knoke/
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]