[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > What do you think about these changes? (attached):
>
> I think I agree now with Arnstein, that this hybrid solution isn't very
> good. We should split Norwegian and Viking nations.
Yes, but it would take a lot of research to find the old viking city
names.
> ESR's flag suggestion is good.
I like ESR's suggestion also.
>Also, in your patch, you apparently forgot a comma after Mandal.
>
> - Per
I don't think there was a comma in the file I altered.
look at the diff.
Andreas R.
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, (continued)
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/03/06
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, Arnstein Lindgard, 2003/03/06
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, esr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/03/06
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, Arnstein Lindgard, 2003/03/07
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/03/06
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/03/06
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/03/06
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset,
andrearo@xxxxxxxxxxxx <=
Message not available
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3594) viking.ruleset, Ragnar Ouchterlony, 2003/03/07
|
|