Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2370) Path finding

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2370) Path finding

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Mike Kaufman <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Freeciv Development List <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2370) Path finding
From: Raimar Falke <rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:36:03 +0100

On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 10:24:55AM -0600, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 05:01:48PM +0100, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:25:16AM -0500, Ross Wetmore wrote:
> > > I suspect that there is a bit more explaining to do about EC.
> > > 
> > > Some user scenario type explanations would probably help the
> > > unwashed understand the mysteries of EC and why any unsigned
> > > number is magically an EC or what this actually does to PF.
> > > 
> > > Frankly, it appears totally useless and should be removed, at
> > > least from any basic pf operation. It can be added back in a
> > > specialized callback that understands and has some use for it.
> > > But wasting scarce warmap cycles creating, manipulating and
> > > storing/copying EC values around that have no function in the
> > > general case is not particularly wise.
> > 
> > find_a_direction has to be emulated. EC is the solution. EC will also
> > help on other tasks to prefer a certain path. Examples are path with
> > the minimal number of steps or the path with the most tiles uncovered.
> yes, yes, Ross---being more wordy that I can bring myself to be---says it
> perfectly. So ok, Raimar you tell me 'what' it's for (even should it's
> something as opaque as "find_a_direction has to be emulated"), but you don't 
> say how it does so, and this needs to go in path_finding.h

IMHO it is written in path_finding.h how it is done. Not written there
is why is it done (see above) and is example.

Gregory: how can we explain it?


 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot."

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]