Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2370) Path finding

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2370) Path finding

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Raimar Falke <rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2370) Path finding
From: "Per I. Mathisen" <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:23:17 +0000 (GMT)

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > You change pf code. I am not going to touch that. Either it is possible to
> > implement overlapping without changing pf code, or I'm sending the ball
> > back to the two of you.
> Now, now.It was never going to be easy.  You will always have to write
> callbacks if you want something not completely boringly standard.

Actually, overlapping is the default now (with warmap), and I think that
is a very wise design decision. Can we go back to doing overlapping as
default? In most cases, we'll have to do target viability checks anyway,
so it won't introduce an extra check.

  - Per

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]