Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: May 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Artillery and sea units (PR#1476)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Artillery and sea units (PR#1476)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@xxxxxxx>, dspeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx, raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx, bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Artillery and sea units (PR#1476)
From: Christian Knoke <chrisk@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 23:41:34 +0200

On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:03:44PM -0700, Thanasis Kinias wrote:
> scripsit Richard Stallman:
> >     BTW, this is not the only weird flip in the freeciv tech tree.  Map 
> > making
> >     and Seafaring seem sort of backwards, as do alphabet and writing.  But,
> >     then, much of the tree is misnamed -- leadership, conscription and 
> > tactics
> >     are all ancient.
> > 
> > I think it would be a very good thing to straighten this out.
> > 
> > Note that it may be possible to correct some problems simply by
> > writing precise definitions for what these tech levels mean, avoiding
> > the need for any actual change in the tech tree.  Some kinds of
> > tactics existed in the ancien world, but maybe it refers to a specific
> > advance in tactics, such as the ability to give units new orders
> > during battle.
> 
> I suspect that Marius would have been extremely offended at the
> suggestion that he was ignorant of tactics ;)
> 
> Does the will exist within the Freeciv community to do a
> from-the-ground-up review of the tech tree?  

I like this idea. Free Civ! :-)

> The more I think about it,
> the more excited I am about the possibilities.  However, I think most
> everyone who has really studied it will agree that the tech tree's
> relationship to any historical reality is at times rather tenuous.
> 
> If the community would embrace such a project, I would surely be game.
> As a future teacher of history, I am intrigued by the idea of a Freeciv
> which could be useful pedagogically as well as for entertainment.

-- 
Christian Knoke     * * *      http://www.enter.de/~c.knoke/
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]