[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
scripsit Per I. Mathisen:
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, Raahul Kumar wrote:
> > The current implementation of specialists is wrong. Civ 2 has
> > specialists taken from content citizens. If there are no content
> > citizens, unhappy citizens are used instead.
> >
> > The current Freeciv implementation is very buggy, in that unhappy
> > citizens are considered first! This makes elvises not very useful,
> > as the same amount of taxmen or scientists solve your happiness
> > problems just as well.
>
> Do people agree that this is a bug, and one that needs fixing now
> before the release?
I won't presume to say when it ought to be done, since I'm not the one
who will do the coding ;)
However, regardless of how Civ2 does it, IMHO it is preferable to use
the content citizens first, so as to increase the differentiation among
specialists. I noted this in the last game I played; it seemed strange
to me to take rioters off the street, put them in lab coats, and send
them off to cure cancer . . .
--
Thanasis Kinias
Web Developer, Information Technology
Graduate Student, Department of History
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.
Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul,
Ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Per I. Mathisen, 2002/05/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436),
Thanasis Kinias <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Raahul Kumar, 2002/05/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Christian Knoke, 2002/05/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Greg Wooledge, 2002/05/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Per I. Mathisen, 2002/05/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Raahul Kumar, 2002/05/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Per I. Mathisen, 2002/05/12
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civ 2 style happiness (PR#1436), Reinier Post, 2002/05/12
|
|