Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sailing on Rivers
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sailing on Rivers

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Erik Sigra <freeciv@xxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Sailing on Rivers
From: Thue <thue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:39:15 +0200
Reply-to: thue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:34:11 Erik Sigra wrote:
> Tony Stuckey wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 07:31:36PM +0200, Erik Sigra wrote:
> > > I believe that when Sid Meier decided about the 1/3 rate on rivers, his
> > > intention was to simulate the possibility that land units could be
> > > transported by river boats, but the actual boats were below his scale of
> > > simulation. Now that we (soon) have river boats, we should remove this
> > > bonus for land units and let the player handle it properly.
> > 
> >         Or, we could decide that the actual boats are below our level of
> > simulation...
> 
> I don't think so. With 2 patches (ferryboat & sail_river) under way that
> can automate this for the user, the bonus is obsolete and must be
> removed. If we don't do it, the new riverboat feature will not be
> strategically important therefore not used in real games. I wouldn't
> want to see that happen.
> 
> Freeciv doesn't stand and fall with the river bonus. It would be just as
> playable without it, even if you don't use riverboats. Let's not be
> boring. You should not get stuck in old payciv legacy ways of thinking.

As I said before, I do not think the automated ferryboats can be made good
enough for what you plan. If nothing else then because they cannot know what you
intend to do and thus cannot plan ahead like you could do yourself if you
controlled them manually.

-Thue



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]