Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-data: April 2002:
[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets
Home

[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets
From: Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:22:25 -0700
Reply-to: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx

scripsit Uros Lepota:
> 
> TK>> Another rule of thumb that emerged is this: when a nation appears to
> TK>> be a modern state, its cities must be part of that state today.
> 
> TK> Ouch.  One quickly gets into very, very complicated territory there.  I
> TK> certainly don't want to be the one to make the call on whether Jerusalem
> TK> gets to go in the Israeli or Philistine (==Palestinian) ruleset, or who
> TK> gets Sarajevo.
> 
>     There are two entitests in Bosnia.. Serbian Republic and Croat-Muslim
> Federation.. Sarajevo is in the Croat-Muslim federation, but all that is
> complicated because of the both enitets are in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
>     I think that is better not to include bosnian ruleset.

I agree wholeheartedly.  That is a can of worms I am _not_ eager to
open.

-- 
Thanasis Kinias
Web Developer, Information Technology
Graduate Student, Department of History
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.

Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul,
Ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]