Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-data: April 2002:
[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets

[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets
From: Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:22:25 -0700
Reply-to: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx

scripsit Uros Lepota:
> TK>> Another rule of thumb that emerged is this: when a nation appears to
> TK>> be a modern state, its cities must be part of that state today.
> TK> Ouch.  One quickly gets into very, very complicated territory there.  I
> TK> certainly don't want to be the one to make the call on whether Jerusalem
> TK> gets to go in the Israeli or Philistine (==Palestinian) ruleset, or who
> TK> gets Sarajevo.
>     There are two entitests in Bosnia.. Serbian Republic and Croat-Muslim
> Federation.. Sarajevo is in the Croat-Muslim federation, but all that is
> complicated because of the both enitets are in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
>     I think that is better not to include bosnian ruleset.

I agree wholeheartedly.  That is a can of worms I am _not_ eager to

Thanasis Kinias
Web Developer, Information Technology
Graduate Student, Department of History
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.

Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul,
Ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]