[freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
* "Tomasz" == Tomasz Wegrzanowski schrieb am Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:42:52 +0200:
> For me, §86a(2) is clearly about phisical objects. If it's not, show
> me precedent. If it weren't, books, images etc. would be included to
> list. Also §86a(3)->§86(3) says we are secured.
I am no lawyer, but I am not so sure about your findings.
> I know european laws tend to be less precedent-driven than US law,
> but please show any case even roughly similar to our.
Wolfenstein?
Honestly, I do not want Freeciv to be a test case in this disgusting
matter.
Regards,
Gerhard
- [freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, Reed Meyer, 2000/08/01
- [freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, Gerhard Killesreiter, 2000/08/01
- [freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, Tomasz Wegrzanowski, 2000/08/01
- [freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, Per I. Mathisen, 2000/08/02
- [freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, Tomasz Wegrzanowski, 2000/08/02
- [freeciv-data] SV: Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, Erik Sigra, 2000/08/02
- [freeciv-data] Re: SV: Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, SamBC, 2000/08/02
- [freeciv-data] Re: SV: Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch, Reinier Post, 2000/08/03
[freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch,
Gerhard Killesreiter <=
|
|