Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-data: August 2000:
[freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch

[freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-data] Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: fascism patch
From: Gerhard Killesreiter <killesreiter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Aug 2000 18:48:03 +0200
Reply-to: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx

* "Tomasz" == Tomasz Wegrzanowski schrieb am Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:42:52 +0200:

> For me, §86a(2) is clearly about phisical objects. If it's not, show
> me precedent. If it weren't, books, images etc. would be included to
> list. Also §86a(3)->§86(3) says we are secured.

I am no lawyer, but I am not so sure about your findings.

> I know european laws tend to be less precedent-driven than US law,
> but please show any case even roughly similar to our.


Honestly, I do not want Freeciv to be a test case in this disgusting


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]