[freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
--- Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Raahul Kumar wrote:
>
> > --- Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > What's the Civ III combat system BTW?
> > >
> > > G.
> >
> > A detailed link is posted below
> >
> > http://apolyton.net/forums/showthread.php?postid=577756#post577756
> >
>
> Thanks!
>
> > The short explanation
> >
> > HP:
> > The only different in conscripts, standard, vetran and elite units is the
> > number of hit points they have. During battle each time the unit loses on a
> > battle roll they loose 1 hp.
> >
> > Conscript 2hp
> > Standard 3hp
> > Veteran 4hp
> > Elite 5hp
> >
> > Multiply all these numbers by 10 to get actual hps. They use hp bonuses
> instead
>
> The discussion on Apolyton doesn't mention this multiplication by 10 !
> This multiplication would bring it much closer to Civ II system.
> The absence of such multiplication would speed up win_chance very
> significantly!
That's true. But with only 5 rounds, the advantage will always go to the
winning streak. The chances of flukes with a 2hp unit taking out a 5 hp unit is
much greater than a 20 hp taking out a 50 hp. The reason I believe there is
such a multiplication is because of the Civ 2 files. If you have civ 2
installed, read their equivalent of rulesets. In there it mentions that hps are
multiplied by 10, so a 1 in the hp column means 10 hps. I believe the same is
true of Civ III.
Unfortunatley, I do not own it.
Important: Civ III combat is badly implemented. If you read the site, you know
the players wanted Civ 2 style, with firepower implemented. Too many cases of
batttleship vs phalanx being won by that phalanx.
> G.
>
Aloha,
RK.
Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors and miss.
-Lazarus Long, "Time Enough for Love"
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, (continued)
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Raahul Kumar, 2002/04/18
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/04/19
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/04/19
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Raahul Kumar, 2002/04/19
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/04/19
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance,
Raahul Kumar <=
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Raahul Kumar, 2002/04/19
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Ross W. Wetmore, 2002/04/19
- Message not available
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Ross W. Wetmore, 2002/04/19
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/04/22
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Raimar Falke, 2002/04/24
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/04/24
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Raahul Kumar, 2002/04/24
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Raimar Falke, 2002/04/24
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Raahul Kumar, 2002/04/24
- [freeciv-ai] Re: Approximate win_chance, Ross W. Wetmore, 2002/04/24
|
|