Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12806) idea: harsh climate generator
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12806) idea: harsh climate generator

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: bdunstan149@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#12806) idea: harsh climate generator
From: "Peter Schaefer" <peter.schaefer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 04:34:47 -0700
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12806 >

Actually I think that if you want to make a wholly realistic map, you
should not patch the terrain to match the river, but that you should
use a heightmap both to decide whether there a hills(or even
mountains), and to decide which way rivers flow, and even if there are
inland lakes.

The old generator 1 could be made to work this way, but other
generators don't use heightmaps, so you'd have to rethink e.g. the
island generator so that it both creates islands and uses a heightmap.
It is an interesting task, but not straightforward.

On 4/16/05, Brian Dunstan <bdunstan149@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12806 >
> 
> --- Benoit Hudson <bh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > <URL:
> > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12806
> > >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:38:45PM -0700, Jason
> > Short wrote:
> > > > Also: I have noticed that sometimes the river
> > > > generator will move a river from a non-hill
> > square
> > > > (e.g. jungle), to a hill sqare, and then off
> > again.
> > > > This seems to defy common sense.  I think it is
> >
> > Why does it defy common sense?  I usually think of
> > it as a river moving
> > from high hill to plateau to lower hills; and I
> > fairly like it -- it
> > allows for very desparate survival as Jason points
> > out.
> >
> > I suppose desparate survival might be seen as a
> > negative to some people.
> >
> >         -- Beno�t
> 
> Usually in such a situation in geology, the plateau
> you mention is lower than either of the two ranges of
> mountains, but higher than sea level.  What happens is
> that the river either cuts through the lower range of
> hills, or forms a lake behind them.  Maybe when a
> river is shown going through a hill in freeciv, it is
> intended to depict a ravine, I don't know.  A ravine
> looks different than a river that is moving close to
> the full elevation of the hills.
> 
> I thought of three possible changes:
> 
> 1. Turn  the place where the river cuts through the
> lower hills into something else.  This would still
> leave river+hill squares upstream, in the high range
> of hills.
> 
> 2. If there is a way to reach ocean without going
> through any hills, the river generator should have
> done this.  Therefore, the plateau sqare is bounded by
> hills and mountains.  Leave the hill square as is, and
> turn some part of the plateau into a lake.
> 
> 3. Give some hint to the graphics side of things that
> this is river cutting through highlands, not flowing
> over them, and have it paint a slightly different
> image, to reflect this.
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
>





[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]