Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2004:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7517) Move canvas_store functions into client/gui-
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7517) Move canvas_store functions into client/gui-

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: use_less@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#7517) Move canvas_store functions into client/gui-.../graphics.c
From: "Raimar Falke" <i-freeciv-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:57:17 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=7517 >

On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:14:44PM -0800, Jason Short wrote:
> 
> <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=7517 >
> 
> James Canete wrote:
> > <URL: http://rt.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=7517 >
> > 
> > Made changes for Win32, GTK, GTK2, and Xaw.  Only compiled & tested
> > Win32 build.
> 
> OK.  If we decide to do this, we also need to move the other gui_*** 
> functions there.

Yes.

> Raimar?

graphics is better than mapview. graphics is currently about
sprites. A seperate file for the canvas abstraction would be nice. But
I know I won't get this.

BTW: can we move 
bool isometric_view_supported(void);
bool overhead_view_supported(void);
into mapview?

> > Also renamed gui_copy_canvas() to copy_canvas().
> 
> Why the rename?

The rename is wrong. But we may want to think of a new prefix since
"gui" is very lame. Something like "cs" for canvas store or similar.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  +#if defined(__alpha__) && defined(CONFIG_PCI)
  +       /*
  +        * The meaning of life, the universe, and everything. Plus
  +        * this makes the year come out right.
  +        */
  +       year -= 42;
  +#endif
    -- Patch for 1.3.2 (kernel/time.c) from Marcus Meissner




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]