[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Do you want VS .NET 2003 support?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Brandon Van Every wrote:
> Actual code changes were pretty trivial.Added a few needed #ifdefs.
> Reshuffled some functions so that libcivcommon would be a "base"
> library, and not ask for things actually declared or implemented in
> client or server.I made is_server live in libcivcommon, changed the
> client version of send_unit_info to client_send_unit_info, and made a
> function pointer to dealloc_id. Really trivial things like that, no
> actual changes to code semantics.
It would be interesting to see the diff for these changes. I won't
volunteer for VS.net builds, but if these changes are trivial as you say,
then there is no reason for them not to be in cvs.
- Per
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Do you want VS .NET 2003 support?,
Per I. Mathisen <=
|
|