[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Mike Kaufman wrote:
> Explain again why an extra bit sent is not the wisest course of action?
Sounds good to me.
The history is that a long time ago (around or during the original
PR#1185 discussion), Raimar decided that the extra bit sent was more
trouble than it was worth. Since then Ross and I have been haggling
over how to implement the special-case method, with nary a thought of
reverting to the extra-bit method.
jason
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/08/03
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, Jason Short, 2003/08/04
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/08/05
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, Jason Short, 2003/08/05
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/08/12
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, Mike Kaufman, 2003/08/12
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet,
Jason Short <=
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/08/22
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003/08/22
- Message not available
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#4594) topology fix for goto route packet, Mike Kaufman, 2003/08/27
|
|