[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:15:34PM +0000, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2003, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > Also it should test punit->transported_by so that you can't attack
> > planes which are on a carrier.
>
> No, no, no. punit->transported_by is not reliable.
Then should the code be changed that it is reliable.
Raimar
--
email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"I do feel kind of sorry for Microsoft. Their attornies and marketing
force must have tons of ulcers trying to figure out how to beat (not
just co-exist with) a product that has no clearly defined (read
suable) human owner, and that changes on an hourly basis like the
sea changes the layout of the sand on a beach. Severely tough to
fight something like that."
-- David D.W. Downey at linux-kernel
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2003/05/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/05/20
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2003/05/21
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/05/21
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Raahul Kumar, 2003/05/22
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Juhani Heino, 2003/05/22
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Gregory Berkolaiko, 2003/05/22
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/05/22
|
|