[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2003, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 May 2003, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> > > The layers discussed earlier gave sharp distinctions between the different
> > > layers. I like this since it makes the game rules predictable. First you
> > > attack your own layer, then you attack the other layer. Only two layers
> > > are needed at this point: 'ground' and 'air'. Sea units are 'ground'.
> > Mmmh, what if a bomber attacks a tile with infantry and another bomber on
> > it? Should this situation be allowed?
> Yes. The bomber, being unable to attack its own layer, proceeds to attack
> the other layer (ie the infantry).
Makes sense. Now how about bomber attacking a square with infantry and a
fighter. Shouldn't fighter engage the bomber? That's what happens in a
city (fighters "scramble").
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch,
Gregory Berkolaiko <=
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, Per I. Mathisen, 2003/05/22
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2581) Layers Patch, (continued)