Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3735) Zulu (Shaka) gets a free capital when Catala
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3735) Zulu (Shaka) gets a free capital when Catala

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: rt-guest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#3735) Zulu (Shaka) gets a free capital when Catalan (Jefe) conquers its capital
From: "Paul Zastoupil" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:14:02 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:46:45AM -0800, ChrisK@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:28:06AM -0800, Thomas Strub wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:16:29AM -0800, ChrisK@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:58:33AM -0800, Guest wrote:
> > > > [glip - Tue Apr  1 18:46:21 2003]:
> > > > > > [guest - Sun Mar 23 09:33:31 2003]:
> > > > > > 
> > > 
> > > > > AFAIK the "always free palace" happens only if
> > > > > 1. savepalace is enabled
> > > > > 2. the nation is not able to build palace themselves (i.e. doesn't 
> > > > > have 
> > > > > the required tech)
> > > 
> > > I was thinking savepalace=1 means you always get a new palace if the 
> > > capital
> > > is lost.
> > > 
> > > Help also says so:
> > > 
> > > Option: savepalace  -  Rebuild palace if capital is conquered
> > > Description:
> > >   If this is set to 1 when the capital is conquered, palace is 
> > > automatically
> > >   rebuilt for free in another randomly choosed city, regardless on the
> > >   knowledge of Masonry.
> > 
> > It's a help for newbies .. and i really dislike that it is default at 1
> > on pubserver.
> 
> It has been introduced for Civ 2 compatability. I think the default is ok.

Doesn't it make sense that you would eventually move your capitol?
A turn is a long time.

> 
> > > So I take this that you always have a city w/ palace.
> > 
> > No, only that you get a new when you have a city and you lost the palace
> > because you lost your capital.
> 
> Uh, ok.
> 
> > > But consider these:
> > > 
> > > 1) I recently started a game and lost all my cities very soon. My explorer
> > > then discovered a city in a hut, so my nation continued to exist - without
> > > a palace.
> > 
> > Nice story.
> 
> Don't know what civ2 did - but I would make it build a palace in the first
> city I get.
> 
> > > 2) When you sell your palace you do not get a new one, which is probably
> > > ok. But what happens when your palace is sold due to lack of Gold?
> > 
> > I know no ruleset where a palace needs upkeep ...
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > > And an unrelated question, just comes to mind: what is the use of a palace
> > > in a democracy? There is no corruption anyway, but if you don't have a
> > > capital, it cannot be conquered ;) What am I missing?
> > 
> > You can't build a spaceship without capital.
> 
> So I tend to sell it when I'm in danger ...
> 
> Christian
> 
> -- 
> Christian Knoke     * * *      http://www.enter.de/~c.knoke/
> * * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.
> 

-- 
Paul Zastoupil



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]