Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2408) Problem with diagonal roads and rails
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2408) Problem with diagonal roads and rails

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2408) Problem with diagonal roads and rails
From: "Thue Janus Kristensen via RT" <rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:15:19 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tuesday 17 December 2002 02:27, you wrote:
> I am confused by the difference between the iso and non-iso cases here.
>  Is there any functional difference in the two?  It doesn't look like
> the iso case checks for draw_dialogal_roads.
>
> But, despite this difference I guess it is simple enough to find the
> right spot to insert the function.
>
> This also indicates this function needs to check for
> draw_diagonal_roads.  But since this option only has an effect in
> isometric mode...
>
> jason

I think I just overlooked that option when I implemented isometric view, so 
there is no deeper thougth behind.
I don't know if it is worth implementing draw_diagonal_roads for isometric 
view; does anyone ever use the option?

-Thue



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]