[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
At 10:17 AM 02/12/15 -0800, Per I. Mathisen via RT wrote:
>
>On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Davide Pagnin via RT wrote:
>> This is actual code of city.h city_corruption(), I want to open a
>> discussion on this whole topic and perhaps reach some agreement on what
>> need changes.
>
>I agree with Raahul that this should preferably come after his waste
>patch.
Sounds like a very good idea. There are lots of things to debate about
the current corruption scheme. I don't think this has anything to do
with whether waste is added using one scheme or another and it is really
not quite fair to put all the past sins of corruption as riders on this
task.
I really like Renier's idea about having two interfaces to the same
underlying core computations, and the extension to making duplicate
parameters everywhere is probably not resistable once you have this
foot in the door.
But that leaves the core block nicely isolated for a later round of
discussion and patch.
[...]
> - Per
Cheers,
RossW
=====
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Per I. Mathisen via RT, 2002/12/15
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited,
rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx via RT <=
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Raahul Kumar via RT, 2002/12/16
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Per I. Mathisen via RT, 2002/12/17
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Raahul Kumar via RT, 2002/12/29
|
|