Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: nightmare@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited
From: "Anthony J. Stuckey via RT" <rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:34:51 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 04:19:43AM -0800, Davide Pagnin via RT wrote:
> What I mean here is that if you set corruption_level = 0 for another
> government other than democracy then courthouse behavior changes also
> for that government, and this is wrong, IMHO.

        So Courthouses should become useless rather than inherit an already
defined alternate effect?

> I found counter-intuitive that fixed_distance is *modified* by
> distance_factor and _extra_distance.

        I agree.

> I found counter-intuitive that you can have modified_distances over the
> max_distance_cap that you have set.

        Also agreed.



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]