[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 04:19:43AM -0800, Davide Pagnin via RT wrote:
> What I mean here is that if you set corruption_level = 0 for another
> government other than democracy then courthouse behavior changes also
> for that government, and this is wrong, IMHO.
So Courthouses should become useless rather than inherit an already
defined alternate effect?
> I found counter-intuitive that fixed_distance is *modified* by
> distance_factor and _extra_distance.
I agree.
> I found counter-intuitive that you can have modified_distances over the
> max_distance_cap that you have set.
Also agreed.
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Per I. Mathisen via RT, 2002/12/15
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx via RT, 2002/12/15
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Raahul Kumar via RT, 2002/12/16
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Per I. Mathisen via RT, 2002/12/17
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2574) RFC: (PR# 1762) corruption revisited, Raahul Kumar via RT, 2002/12/29
|
|