Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: June 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC: Artillery Patch
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC: Artillery Patch

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Kenn Munro <kenn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx>, freeciv development list <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC: Artillery Patch
From: Raimar Falke <rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 09:12:23 +0200

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 11:22:16PM -0400, Kenn Munro wrote:
> I don't like the idea of land units being able to attack sea units.  The
> Earth's circumference is 40,000 km.  With the default xsize/ysize
> (80/50), that's 500x400 km per square.  It isn't very realistic that a
> catapult, or even longer range artillery, could attack a ship at a
> random location in that square.
> 
> On small-scale maps, it might be more realistic.  But even if the
> artillery could reach, the ship would likely be able to retreat without
> sustaining major damage.  This may be where a bombard effect would come
> into play.. the artillery could inflict a certain amount of damage on
> the ship, without necessarily destroying it.

If we give the range of bombardment per unittype in km. And a tile
size if the map (450 in the case above). We could calculate
range_in_tiles=range_in_km/tile_size.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Python is executable pseudocode. Perl is executable line noise"
    -- Bruce Eckel


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]