[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 01:38:09PM +0200, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> > But it is probably better to offer tarballs and distributions
> > in which such selections have already been made.
>
> Well, I don't have anything against tarballs and such with whatever
> setup but I do think that cvs should include everything... Makes life a
> lot easier methinks...
CVS includes everything, but the tarballs generated from it don't have to.
> /Daniel
--
Reinier
- [Freeciv-Dev] freeciv is big ..., Karl-Ingo Friese, 2001/10/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Raimar Falke, 2001/10/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Karl-Ingo Friese, 2001/10/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Raahul Kumar, 2001/10/17
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Reinier Post, 2001/10/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Daniel Sjölie, 2001/10/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Raahul Kumar, 2001/10/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...,
Reinier Post <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Miguel Farah F., 2001/10/19
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2001/10/17
[Freeciv-Dev] Lean Freeciv, Raahul Kumar, 2001/10/17
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ..., Jason Dorje Short, 2001/10/17
|
|
