Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: October 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Daniel_Sjölie" <deepone@xxxxxxxxxx>, Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Freeciv developers <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...
From: Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 05:56:33 -0700 (PDT)

--- Daniel_Sjölie <deepone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2001-10-19 10:40:19, Reinier Post wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 03:28:23AM -0700, Raahul Kumar wrote:
> > 
> > > Obviously time for a freeciv poll on the website. Which tileset should be
> left
> > > out? I agree with leaving out the engels tileset, more controversially
> > > I think Freeciv should ship with only one tileset. The others can always
> > > be downloaded later.
> > 
> > In that case my vote is for trident or tinydent.
> > But it is probably better to offer tarballs and distributions
> > in which such selections have already been made.
> 
> Well, I don't have anything against tarballs and such with whatever
> setup but I do think that cvs should include everything... Makes life a
> lot easier methinks...
> 

It doesn't make any difference, how often do the tilesets change? Engels has
not
changed in a very long time, same with the others. Leaving a tileset out does
not
have any effect on the important parts of freeciv. And anyone who wants can
always download them easily enough off freeciv.org.

> /Daniel
> 
> -- 
> Now take a deep breath, smile and don't take life so seriously... :)
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]