Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: October 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Daniel Sj?lie <deepone@xxxxxxxxxx>, Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>, Freeciv developers <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: freeciv is big ...
From: "Miguel Farah F." <miguel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:00:41 -0300

 Daniel Sj?lie [19/10/2001 08:34] dijo/said:
>On 2001-10-19 10:40:19, Reinier Post wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 03:28:23AM -0700, Raahul Kumar wrote:
>> 
>> > Obviously time for a freeciv poll on the website. Which tileset should be 
>> > left
>> > out? I agree with leaving out the engels tileset, more controversially
>> > I think Freeciv should ship with only one tileset. The others can always
>> > be downloaded later.
>> 
>> In that case my vote is for trident or tinydent.
>> But it is probably better to offer tarballs and distributions
>> in which such selections have already been made.
>
>Well, I don't have anything against tarballs and such with whatever
>setup but I do think that cvs should include everything... Makes life a
>lot easier methinks...

I concur. I think that all Freeciv-related stuff should be in one big
pack.


-- 
MIGUEL FARAH              //   miguel@xxxxx
#include <disclaimer.h>   //   http://www.nn.cl/~miguel
<*>
 (__)   Errar es humano. Mugir es bovino.
 ( oo /
 /\_|


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]