[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Jeff Mallatt writes:
> At 2001/02/10 13:35 , Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa wrote:
> >Here is yet another slightly changed version of Andreas's patch.
> >
> >After it's tested if it works in Windows (could you please do it Andreas?)
> >If there's nothing wrong with it and noone objects it will be commited.
>
> A few problems with the patch:
>
> - It moves some includes from .c file to .h files *that don't use them*.
> Because of some conflicts I have encountered with trying to compile these
> includes on some versions, I prefer them to remain where they were.
>
> - The coding style doesn't match Freeciv's standard. Worse, the patch
> RE-formats some things from conformant to non-conformant (e.g., netintf.h).
>
> - The config stuff for fdopen() doesn't work.
>
> - The config stuff is platform-oriented (e.g. WIN32_NATIVE (also, it uses
> HAVE_WINSOCK_H to condition code, not just includes), instead of
> function-oriented (e.g., HAVE_RECV). I realize this is a difficult issue,
> and it may be as close as it can get, but to me it appears to need a second
> look.
>
That's difficult. We need testing code like this:
#ifdef HAVE_WINSOCK_H
int __stdcall recv(int,void *,int,int)
#else
int recv(int, void *,int,int);
main()
{
recv(0,NULL,0,0);
}
Winsock32.dll has a symbol called recv@16, but no recv.
AFAIK cygwin1.dll has recv. I don't like this kind of code.
The __stdcall attribute makes gcc convert the symbol.
> It now seems to work on Linux. It needs to be tested on Windows (and BeOS).
It also works on Windows.
>
> At 2001/02/11 07:36 , Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> >Some modifications are needed:
> >It is safer to use _beginthreadex instead of CreateThread because some
> >C-Lib data structs are initialized then but it has a strange prototype,
> >so some casts are necessary. I have looked into my win32 book for this.
>
> I didn't include Andreas' patch, though it should be before being
> committed. (If whoever tests this on Windows would combine the patches,
> that would be greatly appreciated.)
>
Done. complete patch is attached. winsock.h was not included at many
places!
Greetings
Andreas Kemnade
win32-8.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
- [Freeciv-Dev] Winsock patch, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2001/02/10
- [Freeciv-Dev] Winsock patch, Andreas Kemnade, 2001/02/11
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Jeff Mallatt, 2001/02/12
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch,
Andreas Kemnade <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2001/02/12
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Andreas Kemnade, 2001/02/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Jeff Mallatt, 2001/02/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Andreas Kemnade, 2001/02/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Jeff Mallatt, 2001/02/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Andreas Kemnade, 2001/02/14
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Sebastian Bauer, 2001/02/13
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Dirk Stoecker, 2001/02/14
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Andreas Kemnade, 2001/02/14
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Winsock patch, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2001/02/14
|
|