[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy.
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Thue wrote:
> I agree. So how about changing the prerequisites from
>
> physics
> invention
>
> to
>
> physics
> metallurgy
Good idea, but I forgot about one important thing:
in this situation, Ironclad should have 5/4/4 (attack power 5),
attack power 4 is too obsolete in Metallurgy era (coastial defence etc).
> (this will of course only be done in the freeciv ruleset, the civ 2 ruleset
> will continue to be, like, civ 2 compatible)
Who is using Civ* rulesets instead better default one? ;-)
MC
- [Freeciv-Dev] Ironclads are easy., Maciej Czapkiewicz, 2001/01/03
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy., Thue, 2001/01/03
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy.,
Maciej Czapkiewicz <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy., Reinier Post, 2001/01/03
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy., Maciej Czapkiewicz, 2001/01/04
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy., Thue, 2001/01/04
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy., martin.mcmahon, 2001/01/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy., Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/01/06
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Ironclads are easy., Marko Lindqvist, 2001/01/04
|
|