[Freeciv-Dev] Re: feature freeze
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 09:24:43PM +0100, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
>
> Isn't it reasonable to sync Debian and Freeciv :
To begin with, I was just ranting. Then, your proposal is
well-meaning but not doable.
> - freeciv.org makes freeciv-*.deb daily from CVS tree and
> send it to debian.org/Incoming
Possible, but not desireable. CVS snapshots don't necessarily
work, and it's a bad idea to have everyone who uses Debian's
unstable using a CVS snapshot.
> - in stable Debian we have last stable Freeciv
Not always. Debian stable is stable; so, after it is released,
I can't change the version of Freeciv in it. So, in stable
Debian, we have the Freeciv wich was stable by freezing time.
> - in unstable Debian we have current CVS Freeciv
Not desireable, what if there is a stable Freeciv newer than
the one in Debian stable? And what if the current CVS doesn't
work?
> - when Debian freeze, we put last stable to frozen, CVS to unstable,
> and update frozen only to new stable version if it appear during freeze
I can't update frozen, that's what it means. I can only upload
bugfixes, which is not the case.
> - maintainer of freeciv-* is set to `"Freeciv Team" <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>'
Not possible. Maintainer can only be a team when it's a Debian
team - like, the Apt team, or the debian-libc list, or the
Debian boot-floppies team.
Anyway, syncing Freeciv to Debian is not a problem. The real
problem is internal to Debian (the fact that there is too much
time between our releases).
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
I am Lalo of deB-org. You will be freed.
Resistance is futile.
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:lalo@xxxxxxxxxx
pgp key in the web page
Debian GNU/Linux --- http://www.debian.org
Brazil of Darkness -- http://zope.gf.com.br/BroDar
|
|