| Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Plans for the future[Top] [All Lists][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
 
 Reinier Post wrote:
> 
> I'd like to have the version number indicate incompatibility - will this
> be a problem?  E.g. 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 clients/servers would be interoperable,
> 1.7.* and 1.8.* wouldn't.  There has been discussion in the past about
> the meaning of version numbers but I'm not sure what the outcome was.
Note that with rulesets, a version with rulesets is not interoperable
with a version without rulesets, except to the extent that it can 
interoperate enough to tell (via capabilities) that its non-interoperable...
It you see what I mean :-/
> A savefile directory cleaner is attached (small patch since last
> version).  Submitted for inclusion into the distribution, if anybody
> but me sees the need.
Unfortunately this doesn't help me much because I don't tend to play 
straight through: instead I save at some point and then restart later, 
which messes up the autosave sequences. 
(But even so it should certainly go into the utils pack.)
-- David
 
 
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Plans for the future, Greg Wooledge, 1998/11/13
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Plans for the future,
David Pfitzner <=
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Plans for the future, Mitch Davis, 1998/11/15Re: [Freeciv-Dev] city_nn patch, (continued)
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] city_nn patch, Dee Jay Randall, 1998/11/18
[Freeciv-Dev] flag, city names etc configuration?, Mirar, 1998/11/18
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] city_nn patch, David Pfitzner, 1998/11/25
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] city_nn patch, Massimo Campostrini, 1998/11/25
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] city_nn patch, David Pfitzner, 1998/11/25
 
 |  |