[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets

[Miguel Farah <miguel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Mark Metson [30/04/2002 12:39] dijo/said:
>
>
>On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Reinier Post wrote:
>
>>   + modern nations: they exist today
>>   + historic nations: they have existed at some point in time
>>   + fantasy nations: they never existed
>
>I would think that the nation that *built* the city ought to be the one it 
>is listed with, and the name it was *built* with should be the name given 
>it when it is built. The fact that historically a city changed its name is 

So Buenos Aires would be spanish? Rio De Janeiro would be portuguese?

>already coverable by players who care by the fact that the player is 
>permitted to change the name of the city during the game.

Ah, New Amsterdam.