[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Mark Metson [30/04/2002 12:39] dijo/said:
>On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Reinier Post wrote:
>> + modern nations: they exist today
>> + historic nations: they have existed at some point in time
>> + fantasy nations: they never existed
>I would think that the nation that *built* the city ought to be the one it
>is listed with, and the name it was *built* with should be the name given
>it when it is built. The fact that historically a city changed its name is
So Buenos Aires would be spanish? Rio De Janeiro would be portuguese?
>already coverable by players who care by the fact that the player is
>permitted to change the name of the city during the game.
Ah, New Amsterdam.