Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-data: May 2002:
[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets

[freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [freeciv-data] Re: Cities in rulesets
From: Miguel Farah <miguel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 11:08:16 -0400
Reply-to: freeciv-data@xxxxxxxxxxx

 Mark Metson [30/04/2002 12:39] dijo/said:
>On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Reinier Post wrote:
>>   + modern nations: they exist today
>>   + historic nations: they have existed at some point in time
>>   + fantasy nations: they never existed
>I would think that the nation that *built* the city ought to be the one it 
>is listed with, and the name it was *built* with should be the name given 
>it when it is built. The fact that historically a city changed its name is 

So Buenos Aires would be spanish? Rio De Janeiro would be portuguese?

>already coverable by players who care by the fact that the player is 
>permitted to change the name of the city during the game.

Ah, New Amsterdam.

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]